Logo for HistoryGap

Characters Characters - Season 1

Valery Legasov

Largely true
Principled, increasingly tormented scientist grappling with the truth and the Soviet system's pressure for secrecy.

Valery Legasov was a real chemist and key member of the commission investigating Chernobyl. While the series captures his significant role, his efforts to reveal the truth, and his eventual disillusionment and suicide, some aspects are dramatized (e.g., his expertise level in RBMK reactors initially, his presence and full speech at the trial). His cassette tapes were real, though the show's dialogue is invented.

Boris Shcherbina

Largely true
Pragmatic, initially staunch Party man who evolves to understand the disaster's gravity and support Legasov.

Boris Shcherbina was a real Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers and head of the government commission on Chernobyl. His initial adherence to the party line and gradual, grim understanding of the situation, along with his working relationship with Legasov, are depicted, though his portrayal is a somewhat dramatized version of the real man, and he was not present at the trial as shown.

Ulana Khomyuk

Not historic
Determined, truth-seeking nuclear physicist who tirelessly investigates the accident's cause.

Ulana Khomyuk is a fictional composite character. She was created to represent the many Soviet scientists who worked to understand and mitigate the disaster, investigate its causes, and who often faced danger and resistance in doing so. She embodies their collective efforts and moral courage.

Anatoly Dyatlov

Disputed
Arrogant, stubborn deputy chief-engineer who bullies subordinates and disregards safety protocols during the test.

Anatoly Dyatlov was the real deputy chief engineer supervising the test. The series portrays him as a primary villain, exceptionally tyrannical and dismissive of warnings. While he was found guilty and acknowledged procedural violations, some who knew him and other accounts suggest this portrayal is overly negative and simplistic, and that he was also a victim of a flawed system and reactor design, rather than purely a "bully."

Lyudmilla Ignatenko

Historic
Devoted wife of a first-responder firefighter, witnessing his horrific decline from acute radiation sickness.

Lyudmilla Ignatenko is a real person whose story was prominently featured in Svetlana Alexievich's book "Voices from Chernobyl." The series accurately portrays her harrowing experience caring for her dying husband, Vasily, and the devastating personal toll, though the scientific explanation for her baby's death is debated.

Vasily Ignatenko

Historic
Young, brave firefighter who is among the first to respond to the reactor fire, suffering a fatal radiation dose.

Vasily Ignatenko was a real firefighter who died from acute radiation syndrome (ARS) after responding to the Chernobyl fire. His heroic actions and tragic, painful death are accurately depicted based on his wife's accounts and medical records of ARS victims.

More characters

Viktor Bryukhanov

Largely true
Plant director, initially in denial and focused on downplaying the disaster's scale to superiors.

Viktor Bryukhanov was the real plant director. The series shows him as overwhelmed, indecisive, and keen to report minimized information, which aligns with some accounts of his initial response. However, some argue his portrayal is overly negative and doesn't fully capture the immense pressure and lack of information he faced.

Nikolai Fomin

Largely true
Chief engineer, similarly portrayed as in denial and deflecting responsibility alongside Bryukhanov.

Nikolai Fomin was the real chief engineer. Like Bryukhanov, he is depicted as downplaying the severity and being complicit in the flawed initial response. This portrayal is based on accounts of the disaster's early hours, though it likely simplifies his full character and actions.

Mikhail Gorbachev

Largely true
Soviet General Secretary, depicted making critical decisions based on information from the commission.

Mikhail Gorbachev was the leader of the Soviet Union at the time. The series shows him receiving reports and making decisions regarding the disaster. While his involvement was real, the specific meetings and dialogues are dramatized representations of the broader governmental response and decision-making process.

Aleksandr Akimov

Historic
Night shift supervisor in the control room, initially follows Dyatlov's orders but later realizes the catastrophe.

Aleksandr Akimov was the real shift supervisor of Unit 4 on the night of the accident. He died from ARS. The series accurately portrays his actions under Dyatlov's command and his efforts to mitigate the disaster once its scale became apparent.

Leonid Toptunov

Historic
Young, inexperienced reactor control engineer pressured by Dyatlov during the ill-fated test.

Leonid Toptunov was the real senior reactor control engineer involved in the test, who also died from ARS. His youth, inexperience with the specific test parameters, and the pressure he was under from Dyatlov are accurately depicted.

General Nikolai Tarakanov

Historic
Commander of the "liquidators" who worked on the highly radioactive rooftop cleanup.

General Tarakanov was a real military figure who oversaw some of the most dangerous cleanup operations at Chernobyl, including the "bio-robots" (soldiers) clearing debris from the reactor roof. His stoic and duty-bound portrayal is generally accurate.

Story Story - Season 1

The safety test and subsequent explosion of Reactor 4.

True

The series accurately portrays the conditions leading to the ill-fated safety test, the procedural violations, the reactor design flaws (positive void coefficient, ineffective SCRAM design at low power), and the two explosions that destroyed the core. The fundamental cause and sequence of the accident are correctly depicted.

Firefighters' immediate response without adequate protection or knowledge of radiation levels.

True

The heroism and tragic fate of the first-responding firefighters, who battled the fires on the reactor building roof with little understanding of the extreme radiation hazard, are accurately shown. Their subsequent deaths from Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) are well-documented.

Initial denial and downplaying of the disaster by plant management and local officials.

True

The initial response by plant director Bryukhanov and chief engineer Fomin, characterized by disbelief, underestimation of the reactor's destruction, and delayed/minimized reporting to higher authorities, is historically accurate, reflecting the Soviet system's culture of secrecy and fear of blame.

The "Bridge of Death" scene where Pripyat residents watch the fire.

Disputed

The series depicts residents watching the fire from a railway bridge, subsequently dying from radiation exposure. While people did watch the fire, the idea of this specific bridge being a "bridge of death" where everyone who stood there died is considered an urban legend or exaggeration by many survivors and experts; radiation exposure was widespread but not so localized and instantly fatal for observers.

Evacuation of Pripyat.

True

The delayed but eventual evacuation of the city of Pripyat (around 36 hours after the explosion) is accurately depicted, including the sudden announcement and the column of buses.

Efforts to prevent a second (steam) explosion by draining water tanks beneath the reactor.

True

The real danger of a massive steam explosion if the molten core reached the water in the bubbler pools beneath the reactor was a major concern. Three engineers/workers (Ananenko, Bezpalov, Baranov – the "divers") did volunteer for the dangerous mission to open sluice gates, and they survived, contrary to some initial fears depicted.

Miners digging a tunnel under the reactor to install a heat exchanger.

True

Coal miners were brought in to dig a tunnel beneath the reactor foundation to install a cooling system, a desperate and arduous effort undertaken in high temperatures and radiation. The nudity depicted (due to heat) is debated, with some miners denying it happened on such a scale. The cooling system was ultimately not used.

The use of "bio-robots" (soldiers) to clear radioactive graphite from the reactor roof.

True

After remote-controlled robots failed due to high radiation, soldiers (dubbed "bio-robots") were deployed for extremely short shifts to manually clear highly radioactive debris from the plant's roofs. This dangerous operation is accurately portrayed.

Valery Legasov's presentation at the Vienna IAEA conference.

Partly true

Legasov did present a detailed report to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, which was surprisingly candid for Soviet standards at the time. However, the series dramatizes his internal conflict and the extent of his public criticism of the Soviet system at this specific event.

The trial of Dyatlov, Bryukhanov, and Fomin.

Partly true

There was a trial for Dyatlov, Bryukhanov, and Fomin, who were found guilty. However, Legasov did not testify at this trial as depicted in the finale, nor did he dramatically reveal all the reactor flaws there. This scene was a narrative device to present the full explanation of the disaster and Legasov's conclusions.

The culling of contaminated animals in the Exclusion Zone.

True

Teams were deployed to kill domestic and some wild animals within the Exclusion Zone to prevent the spread of radioactive contamination and due to abandonment. The emotional difficulty of this task is depicted.

The physical effects of acute radiation sickness (ARS) on victims.

Good depiction

The series graphically and largely accurately portrays the horrific symptoms of ARS suffered by firefighters and plant workers, including skin lesions, organ failure, and immune system collapse, based on medical accounts. Some minor visual details might be intensified for dramatic effect.

The helicopter crash over the reactor.

False

A helicopter did crash at the Chernobyl site, but it happened in October 1986, months after the initial containment efforts, due to hitting a crane cable, not directly because of radiation over the open core as implied during the sand-dropping sequence.

Setting Setting - Season 1

Depiction of Soviet-era Ukraine (Pripyat, Chernobyl) in 1986.

Good depiction

The series is highly praised for its meticulous recreation of the material culture of the mid-1980s Soviet Union, including clothing, vehicles, apartment interiors, public spaces, and everyday objects. Filming in Lithuania, which has similar Soviet-era architecture, contributed to this.

Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant control room and general plant interiors.

Good depiction

The RBMK reactor control room (Unit 4) was recreated with remarkable accuracy based on photographs and plans. Other plant interiors and the general industrial environment also reflect the look of the period and facility.

Soviet bureaucracy, hierarchy, and system of secrecy.

Good depiction

The series effectively portrays the pervasive bureaucracy, the hierarchical decision-making process within the Communist Party and state apparatus, and the culture of secrecy and information control that characterized the Soviet system and significantly impacted the initial response to the disaster.

Visual representation of the immediate aftermath of the explosion (fire, exposed core).

Partly true

The initial fire and the eerie glow from the exposed reactor core are depicted. While the visual of the open core glowing is dramatic, the intense black, oily smoke shown billowing immediately is an artistic choice to visualize the invisible radiation; the initial fires were of graphite and other materials.

Clothing, hairstyles, and general appearance of characters.

Good depiction

Costume design accurately reflects Soviet fashion of the mid-1980s for civilians, plant workers, officials, and military personnel. Hairstyles and overall appearances contribute to the period authenticity.

Technology (phones, computers, dosimeters, vehicles).

Good depiction

The depiction of period-specific technology, such as rotary-dial telephones, basic computer systems, Soviet vehicles (cars, trucks, buses, military vehicles), and radiation detection equipment (dosimeters), is largely accurate and adds to the realism.

Hospital conditions and medical practices for treating radiation sickness.

Good depiction

The portrayal of Hospital No. 6 in Moscow, where many ARS victims were treated, and the medical interventions (or lack thereof for such extreme cases) reflects the realities of treating severe radiation exposure at the time. The use of plastic tents and the suffering of patients is based on accounts.

Atmosphere of fear, uncertainty, and misinformation among the population and officials.

Good depiction

The series successfully conveys the pervasive sense of fear, the lack of clear information, the spread of rumors, and the confusion that affected both the general populace and many officials in the wake of an unprecedented nuclear catastrophe within a secretive state.

Depiction of the "liquidators" and their work.

Good depiction

The series shows various groups of liquidators – from scientists and engineers to soldiers and miners – who were involved in the massive cleanup and containment efforts. Their diverse tasks and the risks they undertook are generally well-represented.