Logo for HistoryGap

Characters Characters

Captain Rafe McCawley

Not historic
Eager, heroic pilot, volunteers for Eagle Squadron

Rafe is a fictional protagonist created for the film. His experiences, including fighting in the Eagle Squadron, surviving the attack, and flying in the Doolittle Raid, do not represent a real historical person.

Captain Danny Walker

Not historic
Loyal friend, skilled pilot

Danny is a fictional protagonist and Rafe's best friend. His central role in the love triangle, the defense during the attack, and the Doolittle Raid are entirely fictional creations for the plot.

Nurse Evelyn Johnson

Not historic
Dedicated nurse caught in a love triangle

Evelyn is a fictional character representing the nurses present at Pearl Harbor. Her specific romantic storyline with Rafe and Danny is the core fictional element of the movie.

Lieutenant Colonel James Doolittle

Partly historic
Determined, innovative aviation leader

Doolittle was the real leader of the famed 1942 raid on Japan. The film accurately portrays his leadership of this historical mission, but fictionalizes the participation of the main characters (Rafe/Danny).

President Franklin D. Roosevelt

Partly historic
Resolute US President

Roosevelt was the real US President. The film depicts his leadership role accurately, though specific scenes, like dramatically forcing himself to stand, are likely embellished for cinematic effect.

Admiral Husband E. Kimmel

Historic
Commander of the US Pacific Fleet

Kimmel was the actual Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific Fleet at the time of the attack. The film portrays his real position and the context of the command situation leading up to the attack.

More characters

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto

Historic
Japanese Admiral planning the attack

Yamamoto was the real Japanese Marshal Admiral who conceived the Pearl Harbor attack. His portrayal as the strategic mind behind the Japanese operation is historically accurate.

Commander Minoru Genda

Historic
Japanese tactical planner

Genda was a key real-life planner of the Pearl Harbor attack under Yamamoto. The film accurately includes him in his historical role during the planning phases.

Petty Officer Dorie Miller

Historic
Heroic Navy cook

Dorie Miller was a real Messman Third Class who heroically manned an anti-aircraft gun during the attack despite having no training and racial restrictions limiting his combat role. His actions are accurately depicted.

Captain Thurman

Not historic
Naval Intelligence officer

Captain Thurman is a fictional character likely created to represent aspects of US Naval Intelligence and the communication/analysis challenges prior to the attack.

Sergeant Earl Sistern

Not historic
Gruff airfield mechanic chief

Earl is a fictional character representing the ground crews and mechanics working at the airfields during the attack.

Lt. Red Winkle

Not historic
Comic relief pilot, Rafe/Danny's friend

Red is a fictional pilot character, part of the protagonists' squadron, serving largely as comic relief.

Lt. Gooz Wood

Not historic
Pilot, Rafe/Danny's friend

Gooz is another fictional pilot within the main characters' friend group.

Nurse Betty Bayer

Not historic
Nurse, Evelyn's friend

Betty is a fictional nurse character, part of Evelyn's circle of friends.

Nurse Martha

Not historic
Nurse, Evelyn's friend

Martha is another fictional nurse character representing the women serving at Pearl Harbor.

Nurse Sandra

Not historic
Nurse, Evelyn's friend

Sandra is another fictional nurse character within Evelyn's group.

Story Story

The attack on Pearl Harbor

Good depiction

The film accurately depicts the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, including the date, the general sequence of events, and the devastation inflicted on the US Pacific Fleet. The attack itself is the core historical event and is portrayed relatively faithfully.

The heroism of the US military

Average depiction

The film highlights the heroism and bravery of US military personnel during the attack. While acts of heroism certainly occurred, the film tends to overemphasize individual heroism and downplay the overall chaos and confusion of the situation. It leans towards a romanticized view.

The love triangle between the main characters

False

The love triangle between the two pilots and the nurse is a fictional construct added for dramatic effect. It serves as a central plot element, but it is not based on real relationships.

The portrayal of the Japanese attack as a 'sneak attack'

Disputed

The film portrays the attack as a 'sneak attack,' which is a common perspective. However, some historians argue that while the attack was a surprise, the US had some indications of potential Japanese aggression.

The portrayal of the aftermath of the attack

Good depiction

The film shows the immediate aftermath of the attack, including the damage to the fleet and the loss of life. The shock and grief experienced by the survivors and the nation are portrayed with some sensitivity.

The depiction of the 'day of infamy' speech

True

President Roosevelt's 'day of infamy' speech is referenced in the film, which is a historically significant moment. The speech's impact on mobilizing the nation for war is acknowledged.

The portrayal of the attack on Hickam Field

Partly true

The film depicts attacks on other military installations beyond the naval base, including Hickam Field. While Hickam Field was attacked, the film may exaggerate the extent of the damage or the specific details of the assault for dramatic purposes.

Setting Setting

The depiction of Japanese planning and motivations

Average depiction

The film offers a simplified portrayal of the Japanese planning and motivations behind the attack. While it acknowledges the Japanese perspective, it doesn't delve deeply into the complex political and strategic factors that led to the attack. It simplifies the Japanese perspective.

The depiction of the US military's preparedness

Disputed

The film suggests a lack of preparedness on the part of the US military, which is partly true. However, the degree of unpreparedness is debated by historians, and the film likely oversimplifies the complexities of the situation and existing warnings. It's a complex historical issue.

The portrayal of the US public's reaction

Average depiction

The film suggests the attack galvanized the US public and unified them in their resolve to enter the war. While this is generally true, the complexities of public opinion and the debates surrounding involvement in the war are not fully explored. It simplifies public sentiment.