Logo for HistoryGap

Characters Characters

Lucius Verus

Bad portrayal
Son of Lucilla, forced into gladiatorial life

Based on the historical Lucius Verus II (Lucilla's son), but the real Lucius died very young. The film's depiction of him surviving to adulthood, living in hiding, becoming a gladiator, and seeking revenge is entirely fictional.

Lucilla

Bad portrayal
Lucius's mother, involved in Roman politics

Based on the historical Lucilla, but she was executed under her brother Commodus's reign years before the film's events. Her survival and role in the sequel's plot are fictional.

Emperor Caracalla

Partly historic
Cruel, unstable co-emperor

Based on the real Emperor Caracalla. His reputation for cruelty, paranoia, and murdering his brother Geta aligns with history, but the film dramatizes specifics and possibly his appearance/mannerisms.

Emperor Geta

Partly historic
Co-emperor, rival brother to Caracalla

Based on the real Emperor Geta. His co-rule and intense rivalry with Caracalla, ending in his murder, are historical facts. The film depicts them as twins, which is inaccurate (Caracalla was older).

Macrinus

Bad portrayal
Ambitious former slave/gladiator, advisor

Based on the historical Macrinus who became emperor after Caracalla. However, the film drastically invents his backstory (slave/gladiator/arms dealer) and motivations (vengeance). His historical rise and short reign differ significantly.

General Marcus Acacius

Not historic
Roman general, potentially Lucilla's partner

A purely fictional character created for the film's plot, possibly serving as a heroic military figure.

More characters

Senator Gracchus

Partly historic
Senator upholding republican ideals

Represents republican sentiment within the Senate, similar to his role in the first film. Likely inspired by the historical Gracchi brothers from a much earlier era, not a specific 3rd-century figure.

Senator Thraex

Not historic
Roman Senator

Likely a fictional character representing members of the Roman Senate.

Arishat

Not historic
Lucius's wife in Numidia

A fictional character tied to Lucius's fictional backstory in Numidia.

Jugurtha / Jubartha

Partly historic
Numidian figure resisting Rome

Possibly inspired by the historical Numidian king Jugurtha who fought Rome much earlier (Jugurthine War, 112–106 BC), but the character and conflict in the film's 3rd-century setting are fictionalized.

Story Story

Lucius living adult life years after Commodus's death

False

The real Lucius Verus II died young, likely before or around Commodus's death. His entire adult storyline is fictional.

Lucius hiding/living in Numidia

False

This backstory element is entirely fictional, created to explain Lucius's absence and set up his return.

Lucius captured by Romans and forced to be a gladiator

False

Part of Lucius's fictional arc, mirroring Maximus's journey in the first film.

Caracalla and Geta ruling as co-emperors

True

The brothers did historically rule jointly from AD 209/211 following the death of their father, Septimius Severus.

Intense rivalry between Caracalla and Geta

True

Historical sources confirm the brothers deeply distrusted and hated each other during their brief co-rule.

Caracalla murders Geta

True

Caracalla did orchestrate the murder of Geta in late AD 211. The film depicts the event, though specific circumstances (like Geta dying in his mother's arms) might be altered for drama.

Macrinus manipulating emperors for power/vengeance

False

While the historical Macrinus was involved in Caracalla's assassination and succeeded him, the film's portrayal of him as a long-plotting, vengeful former slave is fictional.

Caracalla assassinated shortly after Geta

False

The film reportedly shows Caracalla killed soon after Geta during the revolt led by Lucius/Macrinus. Historically, Caracalla reigned alone for another six years (until AD 217).

Macrinus briefly seizes power then killed by Lucius

False

Macrinus historically ruled for about 14 months before being overthrown by forces loyal to Caracalla's family (specifically Elagabalus). His quick death at Lucius's hands is fictional.

Mock naval battle (Naumachia) in Colosseum

Partly true

Romans did stage naumachiae. However, the film's depiction with sharks and potentially other anachronisms (massive ships, cannons) is inaccurate exaggeration for spectacle.

Gladiator riding a rhinoceros

False

Rhinos were used in arena spectacles (venationes), but there's no evidence of gladiators riding them into combat.

Conflict in Numidia involving Roman army

Partly true

Numidia was a Roman province, and conflicts occurred there historically, but the specific war depicted involving Lucius and Acacius is part of the film's fictional narrative.

Lucius potentially leading Rome towards a republic

False

The film's ending with Lucius poised to lead Rome is entirely fictional, building on the fictional premise of his survival and heroism. The idea of restoring the Republic was also anachronistic.

Setting Setting

Time Period (Early 3rd Century AD)

True

The film is set approximately 16-20 years after the first film (which ended c. 180 AD), placing it correctly within the era of Caracalla and Geta's rule (c. 211 AD).

Depiction of Rome city appearance (color, layout)

Bad depiction

Criticized for presenting Rome as monochromatic (white marble) instead of colorful (painted statues/buildings) and having vast open spaces inconsistent with the dense layout of the ancient city.

Depiction of the Colosseum's scale

Good depiction

The film captures the immense scale and impressive nature of the Colosseum, reflecting how Romans likely viewed it.

Use of exotic animals in arena (rhinos, baboons)

Partly true

Romans used many exotic animals (including rhinos) in arena events (venationes). However, specific depictions like rhino-riding or potentially trained killer baboons are likely exaggerations.

Inclusion of anachronistic items (newspapers, cafés)

False

Scenes reportedly showing characters in café-like settings or reading newspapers are inaccurate, as these did not exist in ancient Rome.

Costumes and Armor

Average depiction

Likely similar to the first film: visually impressive but prioritizing aesthetics over strict 3rd-century accuracy. May mix elements from different periods. (Based on general reviews and predecessor).

Diversity of Roman society/army

Good depiction

Reflects the multi-ethnic nature of the Roman Empire, including characters of North African origin like Macrinus, which is historically accurate for the period.

Use of modern accents

Not historic

Characters speak with modern accents (e.g., American, British). While inaccurate, this is a standard and generally accepted cinematic convention for accessibility.